2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Audi A7
To start off, 2013 Audi A7 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A7 (414 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A7 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A7 (549 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2013 Audi A7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 Audi A7 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | A7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | single |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 549 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2139 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1408 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2914 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |