2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 265 kg more than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Outlander |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |