2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Scion FR-S
To start off, 2013 Scion FR-S is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Scion FR-S (199 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Scion FR-S should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 570 kg more than 2013 Scion FR-S.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Scion FR-S. (205 Nm @ 6600 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Scion FR-S.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 Scion FR-S | |
Make | Jeep | Scion |
Model | Grand Cherokee | FR-S |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 199 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1285 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 50 L |