2004 Jeep Liberty vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Liberty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Liberty would be higher. At 3,686 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Liberty weights approximately 254 kg more than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Liberty (319 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda DrifterX. (257 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda DrifterX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Liberty | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Liberty | DrifterX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3686 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 257 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 21.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 80 L |