2004 Jeep Liberty vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Liberty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Liberty would be higher. At 3,686 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Liberty (319 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Liberty | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | Liberty | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3686 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 232 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |