2004 Jeep Liberty vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Liberty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Liberty would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Liberty weights approximately 994 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2004 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Liberty (319 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Liberty | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Jeep | Smart |
| Model | Liberty | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 33 L |
