2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1962 Steyr 650T
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1122 kg more than 1962 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Steyr 650T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 1962 Steyr 650T | |
Make | Jeep | Steyr |
Model | Wrangler | 650T |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1622 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 1850 mm |