2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1973 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 712 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Wrangler | 1973 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Wrangler | 616 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1622 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
