2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 405 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2620 mm |