2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 600 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 1992 Rover 100 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Wrangler | 100 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |