2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 437 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Wrangler | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Wrangler | 200 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1622 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
