2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1998 Lotus 340 R
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lotus 340 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lotus 340 R would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 190 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 890 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Lotus 340 R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lotus 340 R. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lotus 340 R.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 1998 Lotus 340 R | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Wrangler | 340 R |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |