2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSS would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 340 kg more than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (270 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Wrangler | SSS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 71 L |