2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2001 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2001 SsangYong Musso. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2001 SsangYong Musso.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 SsangYong Musso. (318 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2001 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Jeep | SsangYong |
Model | Wrangler | Musso |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 318 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 92.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |