2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Wrangler | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
