2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 320 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Wrangler | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |