2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 293 kg more than 2008 Opel Omega.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Omega. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2008 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Wrangler | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1622 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |