2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2009 Renault Sandero
To start off, 2009 Renault Sandero is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2009 Renault Sandero. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Sandero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 575 kg more than 2009 Renault Sandero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Sandero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Sandero. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Sandero.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2009 Renault Sandero | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Wrangler | Sandero |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 1111 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |