2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saab 03-Sep. (299 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Jeep | Saab |
Model | Wrangler | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |