2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (217 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S80 weights approximately 73 kg more than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (440 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Wrangler | S80 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 67 L |