2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2011 BMW 520
To start off, 2011 BMW 520 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2011 BMW 520. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2011 BMW 520.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 BMW 520. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 520 (380 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (320 Nm). This means 2011 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2011 BMW 520 | |
Make | Jeep | BMW |
Model | Wrangler | 520 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4907 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2968 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |