2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | Wrangler | Calais |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
