2004 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 427 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 43 L |