2004 Kia Cerato vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2004 Kia Cerato is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Cerato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Cerato (142 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Cerato weights approximately 145 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Cerato | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Kia | Maserati |
Model | Cerato | A6G |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2560 mm |