2004 Kia Cerato vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Kia Cerato is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Cerato (101 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Cerato weights approximately 310 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Cerato (215 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Kia Cerato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Cerato | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Cerato | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2210 mm |