2004 Kia Cerato vs. 1996 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Kia Cerato is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Cerato weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Toyota Crown.
Because 1996 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Cerato | 1996 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Cerato | Crown |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |