2004 Kia Optima vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 938 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Optima | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Kia | Lotus |
| Model | Optima | 16 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2260 mm |
