2004 Kia Optima vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 1169 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Optima | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Optima | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2398 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 199 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 60 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 63 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |
