2004 Kia Optima vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 558 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Optima | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 115 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |