2004 Kia Optima vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 354 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Kia | Triumph |
Model | Optima | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |