2004 Kia Optima vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 634 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Kia | Riley |
Model | Optima | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |