2004 Kia Optima vs. 1981 Lada S
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada S would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 549 kg more than 1981 Lada S.
Because 1981 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Optima | 1981 Lada S | |
| Make | Kia | Lada |
| Model | Optima | S |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2398 cc | 1293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 43 L |
