2004 Kia Optima vs. 1992 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 449 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 1992 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Optima | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2440 mm |