2004 Kia Optima vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 270 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 144 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
Make | Kia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Optima | F200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 408 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1405 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |