2004 Kia Optima vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 705 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 469 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2003 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 791 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Kia | Lotec |
Model | Optima | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 990 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1150 mm |