2004 Kia Optima vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 317 kg more than 2003 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (245 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Kia | MG |
Model | Optima | TF |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1487 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |