2004 Kia Optima vs. 2012 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2012 Toyota Aygo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 624 kg more than 2012 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 2012 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | Optima | Aygo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 93 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 35 L |