2004 Kia Optima vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-05 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-05 weights approximately 67 kg more than 2004 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (203 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-05 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Optima | CX-05 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |