2004 Kia Optima vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Optima would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2004 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 24 kg more than 2004 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Optima | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Optima | Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2398 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11:01:00 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 1573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |