2004 Kia Pregio vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Kia Pregio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Pregio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Pregio (93 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Pregio should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Pregio weights approximately 700 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Pregio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Pregio | 1965 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Pregio | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2540 mm |
