2004 Kia Rio vs. 1965 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2004 Kia Rio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Rio (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Rio weights approximately 490 kg more than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Kia Rio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Rio (141 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Rio | 1965 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Kia | Steyr |
Model | Rio | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 1510 mm |