2004 Kia Rio vs. 1967 Vauxhall Viva
To start off, 2004 Kia Rio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Vauxhall Viva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Vauxhall Viva would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Rio (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1967 Vauxhall Viva. (69 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1967 Vauxhall Viva.
Because 1967 Vauxhall Viva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Vauxhall Viva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Rio | 1967 Vauxhall Viva | |
| Make | Kia | Vauxhall |
| Model | Rio | Viva |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1159 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 61 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2440 mm |
