2004 Kia Rio vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Kia Rio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 230 kg more than 2004 Kia Rio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Rio | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
Model | Rio | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2680 mm |