2004 Kia Rio vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Rio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Rio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Rio weights approximately 10 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Zero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Citroen C-Zero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Rio | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
Make | Kia | Citroen |
Model | Rio | C-Zero |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2550 mm |