2004 Kia Rio vs. 2012 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Rio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Rio would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Rio (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Rio weights approximately 219 kg more than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Rio (141 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Rio | 2012 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Kia | Daewoo |
Model | Rio | Matiz |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 87 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 67.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 871 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 35 L |