2004 Kia Sedona vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Sedona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Sedona would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Compass. (158 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Sedona | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Kia | Jeep |
Model | Sedona | Compass |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 51 L |