2004 Kia Sedona vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Sedona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Sedona would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia Optima (197 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Sedona weights approximately 724 kg more than 2013 Kia Optima.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia Optima. (252 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Sedona | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Kia | Kia |
Model | Sedona | Optima |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 97 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2178 kg | 1454 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2795 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |