2004 Kia Sedona vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Sedona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Sedona would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Sedona weights approximately 18 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Sedona. (296 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Kia Sedona | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Kia | Volvo |
| Model | Sedona | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3490 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2178 kg | 2160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4807 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1784 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
