2004 Kia Shuma vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 Kia Shuma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Shuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Kia Shuma. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Shuma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Shuma weights approximately 115 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Shuma | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Kia | MCC |
Model | Shuma | Smart |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.4 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |