2004 Kia Shuma vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Kia Shuma. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Shuma.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Kia Shuma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Kia Shuma | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Kia | Chevrolet |
Model | Shuma | Captiva |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |